|
|
|
¹Ú¿µÁÖ ( Park Young-Joo ) - °í·Á´ëÇб³ °£È£´ëÇÐ
¹ÚÀº¼÷ ( Park Eun-Sook ) - °í·Á´ëÇб³ °£È£´ëÇÐ À强¿Á ( Chang Sung-Ok ) - °í·Á´ëÇб³ °£È£´ëÇÐ ÃÖ¸í¼÷ ( Choi Myung-Sook ) - °í·Á´ëÇб³ °£È£´ëÇÐ ¼ÛÁØ¾Æ ( Song Jun-Ah ) - ¼ÀÏ´ëÇÐ °£È£°ú ¹®¼ÒÇö ( Moon So-Hyun ) - °í·Á´ëÇб³ °£È£´ëÇÐ
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
Purpose: This study was done to examine the relation of self-reported adult attachment style, perceived parental rearing styles and anger in undergraduate students.
Materials and Methods: The six hundred and fifty undergraduate students participating in this descriptive correlational design study were conveniently sampled from K University and S College located in Seoul, Korea. The instruments were Spielberger¡¯¡¯s state-trait anger expression inventory - Korean version(Chon, Han, Lee & Spielberger, 1997), the instrument for measuring attachment styles by Hazen and Shaver (1987), and Hong¡¯¡¯s instrument for measuring parental rearing style(2001). Data were analyzed by descriptive statistics, t-test, $X^2-test$, ANOVA, and cluster analysis using pc-SAS(version 8.0e) program.
Results: The mean scores for trait anger and anger-in were higher in undergraduate students with insecure and ambivalent attachment style compared to students with a secure attachment style. The mean score for anger-control was highest in undergraduate students with a secure attachment style. The parental rearing styles by cluster analysis were grouped as Neglect, Permissive, Democratic, and Protective-control. The mean scores for trait anger, anger-in, and anger-out were higher in undergraduate students with ¡¯¡¯Neglect¡¯¡¯ parental rearing style than in those with ¡¯¡¯Democratic¡¯¡¯ and ¡¯¡¯Protective-control¡¯¡¯ rearing styles.
Conclusion: Trait anger and anger expression might be related to an attachment style and/or a parental rearing style.
|
|
KeyWords
|
|
´ëÇлý, ºÐ³ë, ¼ºÀξÖÂø, ºÎ¸ð¾çÀ°¹æ½Ä
Anger, Attachment, Parenting, Undergraduate
|
|
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
|
|
|
|
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
|
|
|
|
|
|